Calorimetric Determination of Surfactant/Polyelectrolyte Binding Isotherms
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mixing of oppositely charged surfactants and polyelectrolytes in aqueous solutions leads to cooperative surfactant adsorption onto the polyelectrolyte chains. Experimental determination of surfactant/polyelectrolyte binding isotherms is usually done using custom-built surfactant-ion-specific electrodes. As an alternative, we present an indirect isotherm approximation method that uses conventional isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). The calorimetric data is fitted to the two-binding-state Satake-Yang adsorption model, which quantifies the extent of binding in terms of the binding constant (Ku) and the cooperativity parameter (u). This approach is investigated using two surfactant/polyelectrolyte mixtures: sodium perfluorooctanoate (FC7) and N,N,N-trimethylammonium derivatized hydroxyethyl cellulose (UCARE Polymer JR-400), whose binding behavior follows the Satake-Yang model, and dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB) and poly(styrenesulfonate) (NaPSS), whose behavior deviates dramatically from the Satake-Yang model. These studies demonstrate that, in order to apply the indirect ITC method of binding isotherm determination, the surfactant/polyelectrolyte adsorption process must have no more than two dominant binding states. Thus, the technique works well for the FC7/JR-400 mixture. It fails in the case of the DTAB/NaPSS adsorption, but its mode of failure offers insight into the multiple-binding-state adsorption mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it