Integration of the Ecological Approach in Tobacco Programs for Youth: A Survey of Canadian Public Health Organizations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study assessed the level of integration of the ecological approach in Canadian public health organizations’ tobacco control programs for youth. The study used a model that identified intervention settings, targets, and strategies as key dimensions of an ecological approach to programs. An inventory of the tobacco youth programs implemented by regional public health organizations identified 148 organizations conducting such programs, 129 of which agreed to participate. Program descriptions were obtained through telephone interviews. The mean number of settings in which programs were implemented was 3 (SD = 1.3), with schools and communities being the most often-used settings. The mean number of different intervention strategies was 3.6 (SD = 1.7). Most frequently, programs directly targeted youths themselves, followed by interpersonal and organizational environment. Overall, the level of integration of the ecological approach was deemed high. Canadian public health organizations’ tobacco control programs aimed at youth are evolving toward a more comprehensive agenda.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it