Effectiveness of school‐based dental sealant programs among children from low‐income backgrounds in <scp>F</scp>rance: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial was carried out to assess the effectiveness of a school-based dental sealant (SBDS) program for French children from low-income backgrounds. The secondary objectives were to determine the effectiveness of the program according to the baseline individual caries risk (ICR) and to assess the sealant retention. METHODS: The study included 276 pupils from Nice. The sealing was performed in the first or second grades. The permanent first molars were randomized into two groups: one received resin-based sealant and the other no treatment. Active caries on permanent and temporary teeth, visible plaque, Streptococcus mutans (SM) and Lactobacillus counts were recorded at baseline to assess ICR. An intent-to-treat analysis was performed based on the occurrence of new caries at 1 year of follow-up (study outcome). Univariate and multivariable conditional tooth-matched logistic regression analyses (Proc phreg; SAS) were used to assess the effectiveness of the SBDS program. RESULTS: At 1 year of follow-up, 253 children (421 pairs) remained in the analysis. In the adjusted analysis, first permanent molars that received sealants were less at risk of developing new caries at 1 year of follow-up compared with those from the control group (OR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.14-0.49). Independently of the treatment, SM count, and all other covariates, only the variable 'active caries at baseline' remained related to new caries on first molars at 1 year (OR = 3.11, 95% CI: 1.27-7.62). The effect of the sealants was significant only when the analyses included subjects with active caries (OR = 0.25; 95% CI: 0.12-0.50) or with a high SM count (>10(5) , OR = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.10-0.41) at baseline. At the 1-year follow-up, total retention was recorded in 52.7% (n = 222) of the treated teeth. CONCLUSION: The 1-year effectiveness of the SBDS program was demonstrated in low socio-economic areas. Selection of schoolchildren according to individual caries risk factors should be considered in a SBDS program.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.024 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".