MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044098554 · doi:10.1002/mats.201100030

A Simulation Model of Biofilms with Autonomous Cells, 2 ‐ Explicit Representation of the Extracellular Polymeric Substance

2011· article· en· W2044098554 on OpenAlexafffund
Yu-Guo Tao, Gary W. Slater

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Theory and Simulations · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPickering emulsions and particle stabilization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersAdvanced Foods and Materials Network
KeywordsBiofilmExtracellular polymeric substanceMonte Carlo methodBiological systemExtracellularMaterials scienceRepresentation (politics)Work (physics)ChemistryBacteriaChemical physicsBiophysicsChemical engineeringPhysicsBiologyThermodynamicsMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Biofilms are complex colonies of bacteria that grow in contact with a wall, often in the presence of a water flow. In the current work, biofilm colony growth is investigated using a two‐dimensional lattice Monte–Carlo algorithm based on the bond‐fluctuation algorithm (BFA). One of the distinguishing characteristics of biofilms, the synthesis and physical properties of the extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) in which the cells are embedded, is explicitly taken into account. Cells are modeled as autonomous closed loops with well‐defined mechanical and biological properties, while the EPS is modeled as flexible polymeric chain synthesized by the cells during their growth. By tuning the structural, energy, biological, and morphologic parameters of the model, the cell shapes as well as the growth and maturation of various types of biofilm colonies (including colonies with multiple species) can be controlled. magnified image

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular Theory and SimulationsSame topicPickering emulsions and particle stabilizationFrench-language works237,207