MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ozone Corrections for Rayleigh-Scatter Temperature Determinations in the Middle Atmosphere

2001· article· en· W2044104363 on OpenAlexaff
R. J. Sica, Z. A. Zylawy, P. S. Argall

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersScheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration
KeywordsStratosphereRayleigh scatteringAtmospheric sciencesAtmosphere (unit)WavelengthOzoneEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric temperatureMesosphereLatitudeMeteorologyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A well-established technique for the determination of temperature in the middle atmosphere is the retrieval of temperature profiles from density profiles of air. The measurement of air density profiles from the ground and from space are typically determined from measurements of Rayleigh-scattered light. Most researchers using the Rayleigh-scatter temperature technique do not state whether they correct their measurements for the absorption of light due to ozone in the upper stratosphere. Such corrections may have been less significant for initial studies of temperature, but with the current need for temperature measurements of sufficient quality to access atmospheric change, these corrections take on an added importance. Significant improvement to the temperature measurements in the stratosphere are shown to result by including this effect for any reasonable choice of ozone profile. Simple correction functions are presented for temperature measurements, appropriate for low, middle, and high latitudes evaluated at two of the three most common Rayleigh-scatter wavelengths, 532 and 589 nm. Though the 350-nm wavelength is also commonly used for Rayleigh-scatter measurements, the effects of ozone at this wavelength are found to be negligible. The correction functions increase the temperature in the middle stratosphere by about as much as 4 K, with the largest corrections at the low latitudes and the longer wavelength, 589 nm. Deviations from these baseline values due to seasonal variability in the ozone profile change the temperature correction by less than 10%. Despite increases of two to three times of ozone in the mesosphere during the spring season, mesospheric temperatures are found to not require any correction for ozone. Hence, even without explicit knowledge of the ozone profile, experimenters can still significantly improve their Rayleigh-scatter stratospheric temperature measurements compared to not correcting for ozone absorption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic TechnologySame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207