<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:math>-delayed particle decay of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:math>and the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>9</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mn/></mml:math>nuclear system: Experiment, data, and phenomenological analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The $\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay of ${}^{9}\mathrm{C}$ ${(T}_{1/2}=126.5 \mathrm{ms})$ has been studied in two experiments observing about $15\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{7}$ and $8\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{7}$ decays, respectively, at the TISOL facility at TRIUMF; different detector configurations were employed in the two experiments. In this first of two papers, the two experimental setups are described, as well as data analysis and a phenomenological approach to deducing branching ratios to and from states in ${}^{9}\mathrm{B}.$ In the experiments single spectra, and double and triple coincidence spectra, were recorded. Several states in ${}^{9}\mathrm{B}$ were observed; $\ensuremath{\beta}$-branching ratios to these states, and particle decay channels from these states, are reported. In particular, secondary decays into the ${}^{5}\mathrm{Li}$ and ${}^{8}\mathrm{Be}$ ground states were observed. With the inclusion of a considerable continuum and additional states, fair agreement with the reported ${}^{9}\mathrm{Li}\mathrm{log}\mathrm{ft}$ values is found with a phenomenological approach for deducing the branching ratios. To extend the discussion, in a second, forthcoming paper, a multichannel, multistate R-matrix analysis of these data will be described.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.446 | 0.482 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".