Influence du processus de coping de l’enfant d’âge scolaire sur son adaptation à la séparation parentale et aux conflits entre ses parents.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Malgre une litterature abondante sur les effets de la separation parentale sur les enfants, peu d'etudes s'interessent au processus de coping mis en place par l'enfant pour y faire face. Afin d'explorer un modele conceptuel de l'adaptation des enfants qui rende compte de leur processus de coping en situation de stress familiaux et de degager les mecanismes par lesquels ce processus est lie a leur adaptation, 85 enfants et leurs parents, provenant de familles intactes ou separees ont repondu a des questionnaires mesurant les conflits conjugaux, le processus de coping et l'adaptation de l'enfant. Les analyses acheminatoires effectuees demontrent que l'evaluation du degre de menace que genere lasituation influence le choix des strategies d'accommodation et revelent que les strategies actives influencent l'efficacite percue du coping. Les resultats indiquent aussi que le processus de coping des enfants est partiellement lie a leur adaptation. Cependant, les strategies d'accommodation par evitement et par recherche de soutien ont des impacts differents sur l'adaptation des enfants. Cette etude met egalement en evidence l'impact direct des conflits conjugaux sur l'adaptation des enfants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".