F-Like Type IV Secretion Systems Encode Proteins with Thioredoxin Folds That Are Putative DsbC Homologues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
F and R27 are conjugative plasmids of enteric bacteria belonging to the IncF and IncHI1 plasmid incompatibility groups, respectively. Based on sequence analysis, two genes of the F transfer region, traF and trbB, and three genes of the R27 transfer region, trhF, dsbC, and htdT, are predicted to encode periplasmic proteins containing a C-terminal thioredoxin fold. The C-X-X-C active-site motif of thioredoxins is present in all of these proteins except TraF(F). Escherichia coli carrying a dsbA mutation, which is deficient in disulfide bond formation, cannot synthesize pili and exhibits hypersensitivity to dithiothreitol (DTT) as monitored by mating ability. Overproduction of the E. coli disulfide bond isomerase DsbC, TrbB(F), DsbC(R27), or HtdT(R27), but not TraF(F) or TrhF(R27), reverses this hypersensitivity to DTT. Site-directed mutagenesis established that the C-X-X-C motif was necessary for this activity. Secretion into the periplasm of the C-terminal regions of TrbB(F) and DsbC(R27), containing putative thioredoxin folds, but not TrhF(R27), partially complemented the host dsbA mutation. A trbB(F) deletion mutant showed a 10-fold-lower mating efficiency in an E. coli dsbC null strain but had no phenotype in wild-type E. coli, suggesting redundancy in function between TrbB(F) and E. coli DsbC. Our results indicate that TrbB(F), DsbC(R27), and HtdT(R27) are putative disulfide bond isomerases for their respective transfer systems. TraF(F) is essential for conjugation but appears to have a function other than disulfide bond chemistry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".