Comparing methods of preservation for cultures of entomopathogenic fungi
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nine species of entomopathogenic fungi were tested for viability after they had been stored with deionized water, mineral oil, or silica gel or frozen at 20 or 80°C. Species tested included members of the Hyphomycetes, Entomophthorales, Trichomycetes, and Oomycetes. The fungal cultures were maintained up to 1.5 years and were checked at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. For all species evaluated, Paecilomyces fumosoroseus demonstrated the best results, surviving through 18 months when stored with water or mineral oil and when frozen at 80°C. For the majority of other fungal species tested, except the trichomycete Smittium culisetae and oomycete Leptolegnia chapmanii, freezing at 80°C was the best storage method and storage with silica gel was the worst. In addition to culture viability, infectivity against Aedes aegypti larvae was evaluated after 18 months of storage for L. chapmanii and S. culisetae. The simplest and least expensive methods, using water or mineral oil, were the only successful methods for maintaining viability and infectivity of L. chapmanii and S. culisetae.Key words: entomopathogenic fungi, preservation, storage, viability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it