Bibliographic record
Abstract
“A few years before participating in Berkeley’s 1969 Third World Strike, Aoki had already embraced internationalism and Third World radicalism. His politics developed in the historic period following the 1955 Afro-Asian conference in Bandung, Indonesia, and alongside the 1966 First Solidarity Conference of the Peoples of Africa, Asia, and Latin America in Cuba. Through the SWP, which formed a backbone of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, Aoki grew to support the Cuban revolution. In 1965, Aoki was part of the International Secretariat of the Vietnam Day Committee (VDC) in Berkeley, working to launch concurrent protests against the war in Vietnam in some eighty US cities as well as in Europe, Asia, Latin America, and Africa. Seeking an endorsement of these International Days of Protest, Aoki wrote (via an SWP contact in Canada) to the Black revolutionary Robert F. Williams, then exiled in Cuba. Thus began Aoki’s correspondence with Williams and his distribution of Williams’s US-banned publication, The Crusader. As an act of Afro-Asian solidarity, Williams—exiled later in China—solicited from Mao in 1963 and 1968 two statements in support of Black liberation.”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".