MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044427228 · doi:10.5539/mas.v4n7p173

Strength Behavior Study of Apples under Compression Loading

2010· article· en· W2044427228 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFood Science and Nutritional Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTangent modulusModulusComposite materialToughnessMaterials scienceDeformation (meteorology)Compression (physics)Young's modulus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mechanical properties data of fruits are important in the design of various handling, packing, storage and transportation systems. In this research some mechanical properties of two Iranian apple varieties (Golab Kohanz and Shafi Abadi) were analyzed in moisture contents 86% and 84% (W.b) for Golab Kohanz and Shafi Abadi varieties, respectively. Mechanical properties including rupture force and energy, deformation to rupture point, failure stress and strain, Young’s modulus (initial tangent modulus, secant modulus, tangent modulus and chard modulus), toughness and hardness were studied under compression loading using standard methods and so firmness was determined by puncture test. Average values of rupture force and energy, failure stress, failure strain, deformation, toughness and hardness were determined,57.81N, 285.88 mJ, 0.37 MPa, 31.2%, 7.77 mm, 0.06 J/cm3, 9.14 N/mm for Shafi Abadi variety, respectively. The corresponding values for Golab Kohanz variety were obtained 51.11 N, 157.51 mJ, 0.32 MPa, 23.36%, 5.6 mm, 0.04 J/cm3 and 7.79 N/mm, respectively. Initial tangent modulus, secant modulus, tangent modulus and chard modulus were obtained 0.93, 1.76, 2.27 and 2.11 MPa for Shafi Abadi variety and 0.81, 1.52, 2.08 and 2.04 MPa for Golab Kohanz variety, respectively. The firmness obtained 59.26 N for Shafi Abadi variety and corresponding value was 47.69 N for Golab Kohanz variety, respectively. According to results Shafi Abadi variety had stiffer and resisterer issue to mechanical forces than Golab Kohanz variety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it