Effect of feeding sunflower seeds on the performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality, retail stability and sensory characteristics of pasture-fed and feedlot finished beef
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examined the effects of whole sunflower seed (WSS) supplementation on production parameters, carcass traits, and organoleptic characteristics of beef from steers slaughtered directly off pasture or after receiving a finishing diet. Ninety-six yearling steers (410 kg; SD = 44 kg) were randomly allocated to three pasture (P) dietary treatments: (1) supplemented with P-WSS (n = 48), (2) supplemented with cracked barley grain (P-BAR, n = 24), and (3) not supplemented (P-CON, n = 24). Steers rotationally grazed meadow bromegrass-alfalfa pasture for 66 d during the summer and consumed WSS and BAR at a rate of 0.75 and 1.79 kg head -1 d -1 , respectively. At the end of summer grazing half the steers from each pasture dietary treatment group were moved to a feedlot (F) where they were fed high barley-based finishing diets. The remaining 48 steers continued with their dietary treatments on stockpiled pasture for an additional 47 d (SD = 11) until they were slaughtered directly off pasture. In the feedlot, half the steers from each pasture dietary treatment were fed either a control [83% rolled barley, 10% alfalfa hay, 5% barley silage, 1% molasses and 1% vitamin/mineral mix on a dry matter (DM) basis; F-CON] or a F-WSS diet (68% rolled barley, 15% WSS, 10% alfalfa hay, 5% barley silage, 1% molasses and 1% vitamin/mineral mix on a DM basis) for a further 94 d until slaughter. Supplementation of BAR on pasture increased average daily gain (ADG), while supplementation of WSS had no effect on ADG compared with no supplementation (0.73 vs. 0.58 vs. 0.55 kg d -1 , P = 0.023). Inclusion of 15% WSS in the finishing diet decreased ADG (1.46 vs. 1.72 kg d -1 , P = 0.038), dry matter intake (DMI) (11.6 vs. 12.6 kg d -1 , P = 0.058) and had no effect on feed to gain ratio (8.0 vs. 7.4 kg d -1 , P = 0.160). Provision of WSS on pasture or in finishing diets had no effect on carcass traits and organoleptic characteristics of beef from steers slaughtered directly off pasture or after receiving a finishing diet. Slaughtering steers directly off pasture, regardless of pasture dietary treatment, adversely affected most carcass merit, meat quality and retail appearance and acceptability parameters compared with steers finished on a high-barley grain diet. These results indicate that increasing the dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids threefold in the pasture dietary treatment or greater than eightfold in the finishing diets had a small negative effect on animal growth rate and no adverse effect on carcass merit, meat quality and retail acceptability. Key words: Polyunsaturated fatty acids, retail acceptability, beef cattle
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".