Effect of Processing Conditions on Curvature of Anode/Electrolyte SOFC Half-Cells Fabricated by Electrophoretic Deposition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thin-electrolyte anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells (YSZ/NiO–YSZ) were fabricated for intermediate-temperature operation using electrophoretic deposition (EPD). During cosintering, the half-cells were observed to warp—an undesirable characteristic—due to mismatch in the sintering rates. The influence of the temperature for anode presintering—a key processing step—on the curvature of the half-cells induced by sintering was investigated over 700–1400°C. It was found that the maximum curvature occurred for an anode presintered at 900°C, while the minimum was observed at 1200°C. Anode presintering temperature was also found to affect the rate of electrophoretic deposition. At low presintering temperatures, the rate of EPD increased due to the enhancement in substrate (anode) electronic conductivity as a result of an increased percolating network of NiO. Further increases in presintering temperature, however, resulted in a decrease in the EPD rate due to the formation of a surface layer with poor electronic conductivity as a result of NiO diffusion from the NiO-YSZ anode to the sintering crucible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".