MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044572781 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.033104

Crystallographic study of self-assembled dysprosium silicide nanostructures on Si(001)

2006· article· en· W2044572781 on OpenAlex
Gangfeng Ye, M.A. Crimp, J. Nogami

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSurface and Thin Film Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTetragonal crystal systemSilicideDysprosiumMaterials scienceOrthorhombic crystal systemCrystallographyCrystal structureHexagonal crystal systemTransmission electron microscopyLattice (music)EpitaxyCondensed matter physicsNanostructureNanotechnologySiliconOptoelectronicsChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The crystallography of epitaxial dysprosium silicide nanometer scale islands on Si(001) has been studied using transmission electron microscopy. Cross-sectional high resolution images show that the silicide nanostructures have either hexagonal or orthorhombic/tetragonal crystal structure. Moir\'e fringe patterns from plan view specimens show that elongated islands have the hexagonal structure while islands with smaller aspect ratios have the orthorhombic/tetragonal structure of $\mathrm{Dy}{\mathrm{Si}}_{2}$. Less lattice distortion and/or fewer dislocations are seen along the small lattice mismatch direction for both the hexagonal and orthorhombic/tetragonal silicides, indicating that lattice mismatch plays an important role in controlling island morphology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.795

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it