MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044597269 · doi:10.1515/bc.2009.092

Pharmacological inhibitors to identify roles of cathepsin K in cell-based studies: a comparison of available tools

2009· article· en· W2044597269 on OpenAlexaff
Sylvie Desmarais, Frédéric Massé, M. David Percival

Bibliographic record

VenueBiological Chemistry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBone Metabolism and Diseases
Canadian institutionsMerck Canada Inc. (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCathepsin KCathepsinChemistryEnzymeBiochemistryCellCysteineCathepsin LMolecular biologyBiologyIn vitroOsteoclast

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cathepsin K (Cat K) degrades bone type I collagen and is a target for the pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis. Further roles for Cat K have been recently described, some of which are supported by the use of purportedly selective Cat K inhibitors in human and rodent cell-based assays. Twelve commercial and non-commercial Cat K inhibitors were profiled against a panel of purified human, rat, and mouse cysteine cathepsins and in two cell-based enzyme occupancy assays for activity against Cat K, B, and L. Ten inhibitors, including the carbohydrazide Cat K inhibitor II (Boc-Phe-Leu-NHNH-CO-NHNH-Leu-Z), the non-covalent K4b, and the epoxide NC-2300, have either little Cat K selectivity, or appear poorly cell penetrant. The amino-acetonitrile-containing inhibitors L-873724 and odanacatib show greater than 100-fold human Cat K enzyme selectivity and have similar IC(50) values against each cathepsin in cell-based and enzyme assays. The basic inhibitor balicatib has greater cellular potencies than expected on the basis of purified enzyme assays. The accumulation of [(14)C]-balicatib in fibroblasts is blocked by prior treatment of the cells with NH(4)Cl, consistent with balicatib having lysosomotropic properties. These results support the use of L-873724 and odanacatib as tools to identify novel roles for Cat K using human cell-based systems, but suggest using caution in the interpretation of studies employing the other compounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiological ChemistrySame topicBone Metabolism and DiseasesFrench-language works237,207