MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044614936 · doi:10.1109/tc.2012.177

Evaluation of Communication Architectures for Switched Real-Time Ethernet

2012· article· en· W2044614936 on OpenAlexafffund
Gonzalo Carvajal, Chun Wah Wallace Wu, Sebastian Fischmeister

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Computers · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Time Synchronization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersForeign Affairs and International Trade CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceCarrier EthernetJitterEthernetEmbedded systemConnection-oriented EthernetSynchronous EthernetATA over EthernetEthernet flow controlFieldbusComputer networkEthernet over SDHDistributed computingControl systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Safety-critical distributed real-time applications operating with strict temporal constraints rely on deterministic networks with low latency and jitter. Traditional fieldbus systems deliver these guarantees, but they have limited compatibility with open infrastructures and limited support for high transmission rates. Ethernet technology rises as a low-cost, high-speed, and ubiquitous alternative to fieldbus systems; however, standard Ethernet requires special arbitration mechanisms to support real-time traffic because of the standard's inherent nondeterministic behavior. This work explores the associated tradeoffs for three different solutions for real-time communication over switched Ethernet. The paper presents and discusses three architectures that modify different network components, enhancing them with additional customized modules to support time-triggered communication based on Network Code. Using the NetFPGA platform as the unified prototyping technology for all the components, we developed an open-source framework to characterize each solution using experimental data for the latency, jitter, throughput, robustness, and cost in logical resources. The results provide insights to help future developers of real-time communication technology decide which components to modify according to the requirements of their applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on ComputersSame topicNetwork Time Synchronization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207