MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of Salicylic Acid on the Development and Root Nodulation of Soybean Seedlings

2000· article· en· W2044718319 on OpenAlexaff
Bin Lian, Xiaomin Zhou, Mohammad Miransari, Donald L. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agronomy and Crop Science · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLegume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalicylic acidBiologyAgronomyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Salicylic acid (SA) is recognized as an endogenous regulator of plant metabolism, mainly involved in induction of systemic acquired resistance (SAR). Exogenous SA can also induce a SAR reaction and SAR gene expression. Excessive SAR‐related activity can be an overall cost to the plant in terms of energy and materials expended unnecessarily. Elicitation of plant defence responses might also block beneficial plant‐microbe interactions and result in negative effects on plant growth. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of SA concentration (5, 1, 0.5, 0.1 and 0 m m ) on soybean seedling growth and nodulation by watering of soybean seedling roots or soaking of seedling leaves with SA solutions. It was found that 5 m m SA had negative effects on soybean seedling development, but other concentrations of SA did not affect the development of soybean seedlings. In addition, there were no negative effects on seedling development due to SA soaking of seedling leaves. Soybean seedling growth in sterile soil was reduced due to repressed nitrogen uptake following addition of 5 m m SA, indicating that some concentrations of SA can alter the N nutrition of seedlings. A model is presented that ties SA to nodule formation and plant growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agronomy and Crop ScienceSame topicLegume Nitrogen Fixing SymbiosisFrench-language works237,207