MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044752351 · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(03)00361-2

Glutamate substitutions at a PKA consensus site are consistent with inactivation of calpain by phosphorylation

2003· article· en· W2044752351 on OpenAlexaff
Scott D. Smith, Zongchao Jia, Kassidy K. Huynh, Alan Wells, John S. Elce

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCalpain Protease Function and Regulation
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalpainPhosphorylationSerineThreonineAspartic acidEnzymeBiochemistryChemistryRecombinant DNAProtein subunitBiologyAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Regulation of calpain by phosphorylation has often been suggested, but has proved difficult to detect. Calpains extracted from mammalian tissue are reported to contain 2-4 mol phosphate/mol of enzyme distributed over multiple sites, but phosphate groups are not detectable in the X-ray structures of recombinant calpain. Some serine and threonine residues in the large subunit of rat m-calpain were converted to aspartic or glutamic acid residues, at sites suggested by previous studies, to assess the probable effects of phosphate groups on the enzyme. Expression of the mutant calpains in Escherichia coli, and their heat stabilities, did not differ from those of the wild-type enzyme. m-Calpains with the mutations Ser50Asp, Ser50Glu, Ser67Glu, and Thr70Glu had the same specific activity and Ca(2+) requirement as the wild-type enzyme. In contrast, Ser369Asp-, Ser369Glu-, and Thr370Glu-m-calpain were inactive. This result is consistent with the recent report that phosphorylation at position 369 or 370 in vivo reduced m-calpain activation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicCalpain Protease Function and RegulationFrench-language works237,207