Lifetime alcohol abstainers and moderate drinkers have a lower lifetime prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders than problem drinkers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sareen J, McWilliams L, Cox B, et al . Does a U-shaped relationship exist between alcohol use and DSM-III-R mood and anxiety disorders? J Affect Disord 2004;82:113–18.[OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3][Web of Science][4] Q Is the lifetime prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders similarly high in people with high lifetime levels of alcohol consumption and in lifetime alcohol abstainers? ### ![Graphic][5] Design: Cross-sectional study. ### ![Graphic][6] Setting: Canada; date of surveys not stated. ### ![Graphic][7] Population: 13 781 respondents from the National Co-morbidity Survey (NCS; n = 6780; 21–54 years old, non-institutionalised individuals) and the Mental Health Supplement of the Ontario Health Survey (OHS; n = 7001; 19–64 years old; province-wide survey), categorised into three groups based on lifetime alcohol consumption: alcohol abstainers, moderate drinkers, and problem drinkers. Abstainers reported never drinking more than 12 drinks in any one year, problem drinkers had received a DSM-III-R diagnosis of alcohol abuse, dependence or a subthreshold diagnosis of “hazardous alcohol use”, and all other respondents were categorised as moderate drinkers. … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DJournal%2Bof%2Baffective%2Bdisorders%26rft.stitle%253DJ%2BAffect%2BDisord%26rft.aulast%253DSareen%26rft.auinit1%253DJ.%26rft.volume%253D82%26rft.issue%253D1%26rft.spage%253D113%26rft.epage%253D118%26rft.atitle%253DDoes%2Ba%2BU-shaped%2Brelationship%2Bexist%2Bbetween%2Balcohol%2Buse%2Band%2BDSM-III-R%2Bmood%2Band%2Banxiety%2Bdisorders%253F%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1016%252Fj.jad.2002.12.001%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F15465583%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jad.2002.12.001&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=15465583&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febmental%2F8%2F2%2F54.atom [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000224670500013&link_type=ISI [5]: /embed/inline-graphic-1.gif [6]: /embed/inline-graphic-2.gif [7]: /embed/inline-graphic-3.gif
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".