MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044818090 · doi:10.1021/ma900968f

Design and Synthesis of Alternating Regioregular Oligothiophenes/Benzothiadiazole Copolymers for Organic Solar Cells

2009· article· en· W2044818090 on OpenAlexaff
Fushun Liang, Jianping Lu, Jianfu Ding, Raluca Movileanu, Ye Tao

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThiophenePolythiopheneMaterials sciencePolymer solar cellCopolymerOrganic solar cellPolymer chemistryEnergy conversion efficiencyPolymerSolar cellBand gapDichlorobenzeneChemical engineeringConductive polymerOrganic chemistryChemistryOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Low-bandgap regioregular polythiophene derivatives, PTh 6 BTD, PTh 8 BTD, and PTh 4 TTBTD, were synthesized through Stille coupling reaction. These are alternating copolymers of an electron-deficient benzothiadiazole unit and oligothiophene units including hexathiophene, octathiophene, and thieno[3,2- b ]thiophene-bridged quarterthiophene, respectively. The polymers are soluble in halogenated solvents such as o -dichlorobenzene, affording good processability in solar cell fabrication. Meanwhile, the synthesized alternating copolymers show much broader absorption than P3HT, covering the spectral region from 350 to 800 nm. DSC analysis showed that all three polymers readily crystallized, indicating highly ordered intermolecular packing, which is beneficial for achieving higher charge carrier mobility. Bulk-heterojunction solar cells using 1:1 w/w PTh n BTD:PC 61 BM ([6,6]-phenyl C 61 -butyric acid methyl ester) blends as the photovoltaic active layers were fabricated and characterized. Best power conversion efficiency of 1.7% was obtained from PTh 8 BTD-based devices under a simulated AM 1.5 G solar irradiation of 100 mW/cm 2 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicOrganic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207