MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044819691 · doi:10.1116/1.2837893

Field emission characteristics of a lanthanum monosulfide cold cathode array fabricated using microelectromechanical systems technology

2008· article· en· W2044819691 on OpenAlexaff
M. Samiee, K. Garre, M. Cahay, P. B. Kosel, Steven B. Fairchild, J. Fraser, D. J. Lockwood

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing Measurement and Phenomena · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCathodeMaterials scienceField electron emissionAnodeWaferCold cathodeOptoelectronicsSputteringEtching (microfabrication)NitrideUltra-high vacuumResistive touchscreenStack (abstract data type)Thin filmLayer (electronics)Composite materialNanotechnologyElectrical engineeringElectronElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using microelectromechanical systems technology, an array of cold cathodes was fabricated by pulsed laser deposition of chemically and thermally stable lanthanum monosulfide (LaS) thin film anode and cathode contacts. The latter were defined via etching and processing of two different pieces of (100) Si wafers separated via a highly resistive sputter deposited aluminum nitride (AlN) layer, whose thickness was used to control the anode to cathode spacing. The top and bottom Si wafers were aligned and glued together using high temperature, vacuum compatible epoxy. Field emission characteristics were recorded in a vacuum chamber with a base pressure less than 10−7Torr. An average electric field threshold for Fowler-Nordheim field emission in the range of 100V∕μm was measured. The largest emission current measured was about 5×10−7A, above which thermal runaway occurred, leading to a failure of the cathode. The failure mechanism is analyzed in terms of a patchwork field emission model from the LaS thin film reported recently. Suggestions for improvements in the cathode design are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing Measurement and PhenomenaSame topicSemiconductor materials and devicesFrench-language works237,207