Syndromic and sporadic pediatric optic pathway gliomas: review of clinical and histopathological differences and treatment implications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Optic pathway gliomas (OPGs) are the most common primary neoplasm of the optic pathway. These lesions usually present in childhood and can arise anywhere along the optic pathway; they occur more frequently in women; and they rarely undergo late progression. Management strategies after the initial diagnosis are controversial, compounded by the different behaviors exhibited by sporadic and syndromic tumors. Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1), with aberrant oncogenic signaling and consequent predisposition to intracranial tumors, is the most common associated syndrome, with nearly 20% of NF1 patients developing OPGs. A comorbid NF1 diagnosis has implications for tumor location with greater predilection for optic nerve involvement, whereas chiasmal and postchiasmal lesions are more frequently seen in sporadic cases. Syndromic OPGs often exhibit more indolent behavior and lower rates of clinical progression, and the majority of these are diagnosed by routine neuroophthalmological screening. When treatment is indicated, however, the molecular abnormalities that constitute this syndrome can limit the available chemotherapy and radiotherapy options because clinicians fear secondary malignancy and cerebrovascular complications. Furthermore, radiotherapy early in life can impair an individual's intellectual development, endocrine function, and physical growth, thereby limiting the role of this modality in the treatment of this childhood lesion. Differential gene expression and histogenesis among sporadic and syndromic OPGs may account for the different tumor behaviors, but studies correlating specific genetic and proteomic changes with patient outcome are pending. Loss of heterozygosity at 10 and 17q are more common among patients with NF1, and Ki67 labeling intensity of 2-3% and low p53 labeling intensity seem prognostic of aggressive tumor behavior. Recent advances in the development of a preclinical mouse model of NF1-associated OPG will permit investigation into improved detection strategies and chemotherapeutic and radiotherapy treatment protocols.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".