MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044891841 · doi:10.2118/2000-086

Rigorous Modelling of Fractures in a Porous Medium

2000· article· en· W2044891841 on OpenAlexaff
M. Ziad Saghir, Hans Vaziri, M. R. Islam

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePorous mediumPorosityGeologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract While fractured formations are possibly the most important contributors to the oil production world-wide, modelling fractured formations with rigorous treatments has eluded reservoir engineers in the past. To-date, one of the most commonly used fractured reservoir model remains the one that was suggested by Warren and Root more than three decades ago. In this paper, a new model for fractures embedded in a porous medium is proposed. The model considers the Navier Stokes equation in the fracture (channel flow) while using Brinkman equation for the porous medium. Unlike the previous approach, the proposed model does not require the assumption of orthogonality of the fractures (sugar cube assumption) nor does it impose incorrect boundary conditions for the interface between the fracture and the porous medium. The proposed model is derived through a series of finite element modelling runs for various cases using Navier Stokes equation in the channel while maintaining Brinkman equation in the porous medium. Various cases studied include different fracture orientations, fracture frequencies, fracture width, and the permeability of the porous medium. Finally, a series of numerical runs also provided validity of the proposed model for the cases for which thermal and solutal effects are important. Such a study of double diffusive phenomena in the context of fractured formations has not been reported before. Introduction The number of oil and gas fields that are affected by fracture flow is increasing1. It is now known that fractures can play a significant role even when the reservoir is not considered to be fractured. Whenever fractures are present, the contrast between fracture and rock matrix creates highly heterogeneous permeability fields, which result in complex saturation distributions. Efficient production of these reservoirs requires careful management of production rates and placement of injection wells. The biggest scientific challenge appears in the areas of scaling up so that fracture distribution becomes useful for reservoir engineers. Fractures constitute some of the most difficult topics of research from both hydrology and petroleum engineering perspectives. They are often associated with unpredictability and variability2. Decades of studies, ranging from single narrow fractures dominating flow3, to wells or drawdowns in a fractured formation(4–5) revealed many fundamental features of structural geology, and hydrogeology. Emphasis has been given to understanding of fracture geometry1, new techniques for conductive fracture detection(6–7), and new tools for computer simulation8. Similar to the studies on hydrodynamic aspects of fractures, solute transport through a fractured medium has received considerable attention for last several decades(9–11). The latest development in this regard has been the introduction of flow channels12. Early findings showed that the amount of coupling can be significantly reduced due to the fracture channeling if the time scales of interest are short when compared to diffusive time scales in the rock matrix system. Dykhuizen13 showed that for longer time scales this reduction in the coupling is greatly reduced. However, experimental work has yet to be conducted to verify mathematical findings. More recently, heat transport through fractures has been addressed in a coupled form in the context of thermal stress14.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian International Petroleum ConferenceSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207