Reconsidering the Allure of the Culturally Distant in Therapy Seeking: A Case Study from Coastal Tanzania
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines two seemingly contradictory notions found in the anthropological literature that address so-called traditional healers. First, it suggests that despite their purportedly holistic approach, healers in coastal Tanzania may not be as popularly sought after by "local" people as they are made out to be by some academics and health policy researchers. Second, it contends that although there may be a tendency among the people of Tanzania to consult "distant" healers for social relationship-related conditions, the decision-making process involved in seeking out such healers is far more dynamic and context dependent than has been previously reported in the literature. People who seek help from distant healers have often unsuccessfully tried locally available health care resources. In making these arguments, I draw on ethnographic data gathered in a large village in the Dar es Salaam region of coastal Tanzania. In particular, I examine the divinatory practices of a well-known Zaramo healer (mganga) and discuss narrative case studies of two patients who had traveled from distant places to seek the mganga's help. The article concludes with a call for the critical reevaluation of propositions for the integration of "traditional healers" in programs aimed at the prevention and treatment of life-threatening infectious diseases that are predicated mainly on the assumption that healers are popular among the local people and provide effective consultations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it