Microcavity Formation in Alumina Using Ti Templates II: Mechanism and Kinetics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In part I of this work, it was found that titanium (Ti) wire encapsulated within mechanically milled alumina powder and sintered at 1350°C forms potentially useful microcavities due to the consolidation of Kirkendall porosity. Here a series of samples sintered at 1350°C in the range 0–24 h has shown the remarkable way in which these cavities form. The cavity has already started in samples quenched from the top of the heating ramp (0 min at 1350°C). It is surrounded by a diffusion zone ∼300 μm in diameter, which does not change size throughout the firing process although the contents change markedly. The diffusion zone microstructure is initially complex with phase sequence TiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 /TiO 2 +Al 2 O 3 /Al 2 TiO 5 . Microstructure evolution may be summarized as outward growth of the cavity accompanied by inward growth of the Al 2 TiO 5 resulting in a ∼190‐μm‐diameter cavity surrounded by a 50‐μm‐thick layer of Al 2 TiO 5 . The formation of the cavity and surrounding microstructure is discussed although some features, such as the nucleation of Al 2 TiO 5 in the part of the diffusion zone furthest from the Ti source and the ring of Al 2 O 3 , which persists in between Ti‐rich parts of the diffusion zone are still poorly understood.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".