A novel technique for evaluation of apple (<i>Malus</i> × <i>domestica</i> Borkh.) cultivars for susceptibility to powdery mildew
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A technique for the evaluation of apple cultivars for susceptibility to powdery mildew caused by Podosphaera leucotricha (Ell. & Ev.) E. S. Salmon (anamorph Oidium farinosum Cooke) was tested at the Pacific Agri-Food research Centre (PARC), Summerland, BC. Shoots of test cultivars [Braeburn, Creston, Elstar, Empire, Fuji strain BC2, Gala strain Royal, Jonagold, McIntosh, Delicious red strain Bisbee, Shamrock, Silken, Sunrise, and one breeding selection (11w-17-85)], approximately 6 cm in length, were grafted on to branches of mature Jonagold trees in the spring and evaluated in the summer of the same year and in subsequent years after growth on the host tree. Incidence and severity of powdery mildew were evaluated in 1994, 1995, 1997, and 1998. They were not evaluated in 1996 because approximately half the grafts from the previous year did not grow and had to be replaced. The highest incidence of powdery mildew averaged 84% for Gala, compared with only 15% for Bisbee Delicious with the lowest incidence. Gala had the highest number of P. leucotricha conidia per cm2 of leaf area (4.9 × 104) compared to Bisbee Delicious (1.2 × 104). Some of the grafted cultivars were also evaluated for primary powdery mildew and fruit russetting in 1998 after the growth for three seasons. Jonagold had the highest numbers of primary infections and russetted fruit. Key words: Podosphaera leucotricha, breeding, cultivar resistance, pest management
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".