MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044976999 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2011.6026292

Efficient rate-distortion optimized mode selection of H.264/AVC intra coding

2011· article· en· W2044976999 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammed Golam Sarwer, Q. M. Jonathan Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRate–distortion optimizationEncoderAlgorithmComputer scienceCoding (social sciences)Context-adaptive variable-length codingComputationDistortion (music)Context-adaptive binary arithmetic codingHadamard transformMathematical optimizationMathematicsData compressionArtificial intelligenceMultiview Video CodingTelecommunicationsStatisticsVideo processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rate-distortion optimization (RDO) can significantly improves encoder performance in H.264-like video coding applications. In H.264/AVC, rate-distortion optimization (RDO) method has to code the video by exhaustively trying all the mode combinations including the different intra- and inter-prediction modes. Therefore, the complexity and computation load of video coding in H.264/AVC increase drastically compared to any previous standards. This paper reviewed the conventional fast cost functions of the intra encoder and proposed an enhanced low complex cost function for H.264/AVC intra 4×4 mode selections. The enhanced cost function uses sum of absolute Hadamard-transformed differences (SATD) and mean absolute deviation of the residual block to estimate distortion part of the cost function. A threshold based large coefficients count is also used for estimating the bit-rate part. The proposed method improves the rate-distortion performance of the conventional fast cost functions while maintaining low complexity requirement. As the results, the encoding process can be significantly accelerated with use of the proposed cost function. Simulation results confirmed that the proposed method reduced about 85% of computation of original encoder with negligible rate-distortion performance degradation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207