MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045055957 · doi:10.1097/mrr.0b013e3283527792

Measuring steady-state oxygen uptake during the 6-min walk test in adults with cerebral palsy

2012· article· en· W2045055957 on OpenAlexafffund
Désirée B. Maltais, Nancy-Michelle Robitaille, Francine Dumas, Normand Boucher, Carol L. Richards

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Rehabilitation Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in RehabilitationUniversité Laval
FundersCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in RehabilitationUniversité Laval
KeywordsCerebral palsyCardiorespiratory fitnessAmbulatoryPsychologyVO2 maxPhysical medicine and rehabilitationConstruct validityPhysical therapyStep testMedicineDevelopmental psychologyHeart ratePsychometricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study evaluated the feasibility of measuring steady-state oxygen uptake (VO2) during the 6-min walk test (6MWT) in adults with cerebral palsy (CP) who walk without support and whether there is construct validity for net 6MWT VO2 as a measure of their walking ability. Cardiorespiratory variables were assessed at rest and during the 6MWT in 15, independently ambulatory adults, 21-41 years old, with CP. The Gross Motor Function Measure dimensions D and E (GMFM-D and GMFM-E) quantified walking-related skills. Steady-state VO2 was achieved during the 6MWT. After controlling for body mass and speed, the net 6MWT VO2 was strongly related to GMFM-D (r=-0.58, ρ=0.03) and GMFM-E scores (r=-0.66, ρ=0.007). We conclude that for young adults with CP who walk without support, it is feasible to measure steady-state VO2 during the 6MWT and that the net 6MWT VO2 has construct validity as a measure of walking ability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Rehabilitation ResearchSame topicCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersFrench-language works237,207