MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045118505 · doi:10.1080/15502280601149577

Numerical Tracking of Shallow Water Waves by the Unstructured Finite Volume WAF Approximation

2007· article· en· W2045118505 on OpenAlexaff
Youssef Loukili, Azzeddine Soulaïmani

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Computational Methods in Engineering Science and Mechanics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite volume methodRiemann solverInviscid flowQuadrilateralShallow water equationsBathymetryPolygon meshGeologyDiscretizationSolverApplied mathematicsFlow (mathematics)Roe solverTest caseMechanicsGeometryMathematicsMathematical optimizationFinite element methodMathematical analysisPhysicsStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The depth averaged shallow water equations (s.w.e.) are useful and reliable for dam break flow and flood modeling. For their approximation, the finite volume method (FVM) in conjunction with Riemann solvers permits shock capturing. This work provides an overview of the FV weighted average flux (WAF) method applied to s.w.e., and its implementation on unstructured triangular or quadrilateral meshes. The inviscid fluxes are given by the HLLC solver, and stabilization is ensured by the proper WAF limiters inherited from the total variation diminishing (T.V.D.) theory. Additional numerical improvements are incorporated to the model, such as enhancing the calculation of bed slopes, using an optional semi-implicit discretization of the friction source term, and affecting a depth tolerance to dry areas. The model performance is displayed through the simulation of well known synthetic and experimental examples including CADAM test 1 and test 2, which all show that the predictions are accurate and that the triangular mesh seems more efficient than quadrilateral. The applicability to real cases is assessed by simulating the flooding flow in a breakwater on “rivière des Prairies” having an irregular bathymetry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Computational Methods in Engineering Science and MechanicsSame topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207