MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045191700 · doi:10.1680/gein.2009.16.3.183

Diffusion modelling of OIT depletion from HDPE geomembrane in landfill applications

2009· article· en· W2045191700 on OpenAlexafffund
S. Rimal, R. Kerry Rowe

Bibliographic record

VenueGeosynthetics International · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandfill Environmental Impact Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityGolder Associates (Canada)
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeomembraneHigh-density polyethyleneDiffusionArrhenius equationLeachateMaterials scienceGeosyntheticsPolyethyleneGeotechnical engineeringChemistryComposite materialThermodynamicsActivation energyGeologyEnvironmental chemistryOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The results of a diffusion modelling study to evaluate experimental data on oxidative induction time (OIT) depletion from high-density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane (GM) in accelerated ageing tests are presented. The paper provides: (1) results of diffusion modelling of OIT depletion from a GM immersed in leachate and in a composite liner with leachate above the liner at different incubation temperatures; (2) a comparison of the results of the diffusion model and the conventional first-order (exponential) antioxidant depletion model; (3) estimates of diffusion and partitioning coefficients at typical landfill temperatures based on Arrhenius-type relationships; and (4) an application of the estimated parameters to model a composite liner with 30 cm thick sand layer. The antioxidant diffusion coefficients ranged from 2.1 × 10−15 (at 26°C) to 1.6 × 10−13 m2/s (at 85°C) and the partitioning coefficients ranged from 720 (at 26°C) to 4 (at 85°C). The antioxidant depletion time obtained using the first-order model was similar to that predicted using the diffusion model for tests where the OIT was depleted during the test period. However the first-order model gave smaller predictions of depletion time than the diffusion model in cases where there was only limited OIT depletion and in these cases the diffusion model is likely to the give more accurate predictions. Arrhenius modelling provided a means of estimating diffusion and partitioning coefficients at field temperatures. At a typical landfill temperature of 35°C the calculated antioxidant depletion time for the geomembrane considered was about 130 years for a case where there was a 1.5 cm sand protection layer and 230 years for the case when 30 cm sand protection layer was used. Thus these results suggest that the use of a 30 cm sand protection layer in addition to the typical geotextile protection layer between the geomembrane and a coarser granular leachate drainage layer would provide potential benefits in terms of extending the geomembrane service life by reducing the rate of outward diffusion of antioxidants from the geomembrane (as well as providing good physical protection of the liner). This paper has also illustrated how diffusion modelling can be used for considering a range of situations different from those under which the basic experimental data was obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeosynthetics InternationalSame topicLandfill Environmental Impact StudiesFrench-language works237,207