MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045257959 · doi:10.1524/zkri.2000.215.11.678

Thermal annealing of metamict titanite: A synchrotron radiation and optical birefringence study

2000· article· en· W2045257959 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carsten Paulmann, U. Bismayer, Lee A. Groat

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNuclear materials and radiation effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetamictizationTitaniteAnnealing (glass)Synchrotron radiationMaterials scienceDiffractionRecrystallization (geology)CrystallographyChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OpticsComposite materialNuclear physicsZirconGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thermal annealing behaviour of metamict titanite from Cardiff, Canada, which shows moderate structural damage from the a-decay of radiogenic elements (U, Th) has been studied using single-crystal synchrotron radiation and optical-birefringence techniques. Progressive and isothermal annealing experiments yield a temperature-dependent response in the diffraction and optical signals. The low-temperature regime (< 673 K) is characterized by a preferred annealing of Frenkel-defects which results in small changes of the unit-cell volume and the Bragg-intensities on a time-scale of several hours. On constant heating at higher temperatures, metamict titanite displays two-stage kinetics with most rapid effects during the first two hours of annealing and less significant changes after the initial annealing period. Fast annealing of Frenkel defects occurs first, followed by recrystallization of more damaged regions. Single-crystal studies reveal lower temperatures for pronounced annealing effects than previously reported in powder-diffraction studies (ca. 100 K).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline MaterialsSame topicNuclear materials and radiation effectsFrench-language works237,207