The Level of Cognitive Ability among Learning Disabilities Children in Malacca Malaysia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of the study is to examine the cognitive ability of children with learning disabilities (LD) whowere involved in the PDKNet education program. The children involved in this study are made up of childrenwith learning disabilities (LD). A total of 106 children from 7 Community Based Rehabilitation (CBR) Centre inMalacca took part in this study. The instrument used in this study is divided into 5 main basic categories whichconsisted of the ability to identify computer hardwares, alphabets, words, colours and shapes. The findings of thestudy indicated that more than half of the children with learning disabilities (LD) were able to identifycomponents of a computer such as monitor, keyboard and mouse. More than half of the LD children were alsoable to recognize and pronounce words and alphabets. However, they face difficulties in reading and writing therespected words as well as having difficulties in providing examples for the shapes asked. Therefore, teachingchildren especially children with learning disabilities should be given more attention to help them to read and towrite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".