Quantitative assessment of skeletal muscle degeneration in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 using MRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify MRI biomarkers that could be used to follow disease progression and therapeutic efficacy in one individual muscle in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lower limb MRI and maximal ankle dorsiflexor strength assessment, using a hand-held dynamometer, were performed in 19 DM1 patients and 6 control subjects. The volume of residual muscle tissue of Tibialis Anterior (TA) muscle was chosen as an index for muscle atrophy, and the T2-relaxation-time of the residual muscle tissue was measured to evaluate edema-like lesions. The fat-to-water ratio was assessed using three-point Dixon images to quantify fat infiltration in the entire muscle. RESULTS: The intra-observer variability of MRI indices (∼5.2% for the residual muscle tissue volume and 2.5% for the fat-to-water ratio) was lower than that of the dorsiflexor torque measurement (∼11.5%). A high correlation (r = 0.91) was found between maximal ankle dorsiflexor strength and residual TA muscle tissue volume in DM1 patients. Increases in the fat-to-water ratio and T2-relaxation-time were associated with a decrease in maximal ankle dorsiflexor strength. CONCLUSION: MRI appears as a noninvasive method which can be used to follow disease progression and therapeutic efficacy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".