MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045315837 · doi:10.1086/379690

Detrital Zircon Evidence of a Recycled Orogenic Foreland Provenance for Alleghanian Clastic‐Wedge Sandstones

2004· article· en· W2045315837 on OpenAlexaffabout
William A. Thomas, Thomas P. Becker, Scott D. Samson, Michael A. Hamilton

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Geology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyForeland basinPennsylvanianZirconCratonProvenanceClastic rockDetritusGeochemistryOrogenyArcheanOrdovicianLaurentiaProterozoicPaleontologyPetrologySedimentary rockStructural basinTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Late Paleozoic synorogenic clastic wedges in the Appalachian foreland basin contain erosional detritus from the Alleghanian orogenic belt; however, the relative importance of detrital contributions from the frontal orogen, the orogenic hinterland, and the distal craton has not been resolved. To evaluate these components, we analyzed detrital zircons from two sandstones in the Pennington‐Lee clastic wedge in eastern Tennessee: the Lower Pennsylvanian Sewanee Conglomerate and the Middle Pennsylvanian Cross Mountain Formation. Ages of detrital zircons are similar in the two sandstones, ranging from 365 to 2860 Ma. The age range spans the Acadian and Taconic orogenies, the Grenville province, and pre‐Grenville rocks (Granite‐Rhyolite province, midcontinent orogens, and Superior province) of the Laurentian craton. The Acadian‐, Taconic‐, and Grenville‐age detrital zircons have sources in Alleghanian frontal crystalline thrust sheets. The pre‐Grenville zircons indicate an original source in the Laurentian craton (Canadian shield), and a longitudinal river system headed in the shield might have supplied detritus directly to the Appalachian foreland basin in Tennessee. Alternatively, all of the Proterozoic and Archean ages of zircons represented in the Sewanee and Cross Mountain sandstones have been identified in the detrital zircon populations of preorogenic Iapetan synrift and passive‐margin strata along the eastern Laurentian margin, suggesting a source of recycled zircons from preorogenic rocks exposed in Alleghanian thrust sheets. A lack of detrital zircons contemporaneous with the Alleghanian orogeny shows that Alleghanian igneous rocks had not been integrated into the drainage network and/or had not been exhumed. The age distribution of the detrital zircons suggests deformation and erosion of rocks of the Laurentian margin and emphasizes the importance of preorogenic architecture of the continental margin in the construction and erosion of the orogenic belt.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.594
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations106
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207