On the design of bandwidth efficient signalling for indoor wireless optical channels
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract It is well known that indoor wireless optical channels are limited not only in transmitted optical power, but also in signalling bandwidth. This bandwidth constraint arises due to multipath dispersion in indoor settings as well as due to response time limitations of optoelectronic components. This paper presents an overview of theoretical and practical issues in the design of signalling for bandwidth constrained intensity modulated, direct detection wireless optical channels. A brief overview of the salient qualities of the wireless optical channel are presented to highlight the amplitude constraints which arise. A survey of modulation design is then presented which includes the review of a general technique to represent optical intensity modulation in a signal space and to construct optical intensity lattice codes. Results on the channel capacity of indoor wireless optical channels are surveyed and particular emphasis is placed on recently derived asymptotically exact bounds. The use of multiple emitters and receivers in wireless optical channels is also presented and particular emphasis is placed on techniques which exploit spatial dimensions to improve spectral performance. The paper concludes with some remarks regarding the status of the research area and suggestions for future work. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it