MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045425940 · doi:10.1021/ma030381b

Compatibility of Chlorinated Polyolefin with the Components of Thermoplastic Polyolefin:  A Study by Laser Scanning Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy

2004· article· en· W2045425940 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Science and PVC
Canadian institutionsDuPont (Canada)University of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyolefinPolypropyleneMaterials sciencePolymer blendThermoplasticPolymer chemistryChemical engineeringPolyethyleneTernary operationOptical microscopeFluorescenceComposite materialPolymerScanning electron microscopeCopolymerLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dye-labeled samples of a chlorinated (21.8 wt % Cl), maleated polypropylene (CPO), and a dye-labeled sample of poly(ethylene- co -butene) (EBR28, with 28 wt % butene) were synthesized and characterized. The dye was a functional benzothioxanthene related to the commercial dye Hostasol Yellow 3G. These substances were introduced as tracers into blends of CPO with polypropylene (PP) and with EBR9 (9 wt % butene) as well as ternary blends of CPO + PP + EBR9. The morphology of the blends was examined by laser scanning confocal fluorescence microscopy. Control experiments at 5 wt % tracer showed that the dye-labeled CPO was fully miscible with its unlabeled precursor and that dye-labeled EBR28 was fully miscible with pure EBR9. The blend experiments showed that this particular CPO was much more miscible with EBR9 than with PP. Ternary blend experiments intended to mimic the composition of a thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO, with 25% EBR9 as the impact modifier) showed that the EBR formed micron size droplets in the PP matrix and that the CPO completely engulfed the EBR droplets to form a core−shell morphology. Center cross sections of these droplets showed the CPO layer to be uniform in thickness, with a sharp interface with the PP matrix. The inner interface, between the CPO and EBR, was noticeably broader, with a thickness on the order of 0.5 μm, indicating only weak segregation between these two components of the blend.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.570

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it