MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045443006 · doi:10.1109/cca.2014.6981409

Constrained control of the synchromesh operating state in an electric vehicle's clutchless automated manual transmission

2014· article· en· W2045443006 on OpenAlexaff
Hossein Vahid Alizadeh, Mohamed K. Helwa, Benoît Boulet

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClutchControl theory (sociology)SynchronizerController (irrigation)Transmission (telecommunications)Control systemProcess (computing)Computer scienceElectric vehicleControl engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Automotive engineeringPower (physics)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers the constrained control problem of the friction regimes in sliding lubricated surfaces with the purpose of speed synchronization, wear reduction and increasing the lifetime of the friction lining material. The case study here is the engagement process of the synchronizer cone clutch system. Such synchronizer performs the clutchless gear shifting in a 2-speed automated manual transmission (AMT) of an electric vehicle. In the present study, the frictional behavior of the cone clutch system is investigated by considering the involved lubricated friction regimes. By knowing the lubricated sliding friction regimes, the dynamic model of the system is derived according to the variable coefficient of friction. Moreover, the primary sources of the uncertainty and disturbance are recognized and considered in the dynamic model of the system. For the purpose of controlling the system, the control objectives and the constraints are defined, and a controller design method is proposed. The controller design method is based on solving a set of linear programming (LP) problems in the offline phase, which results in a piecewise affine (PWA) feedback law that can be easily applied on the system in the real-time closed-loop configuration. Finally, the performance of the proposed control approach is assessed by presenting the closed-loop control results for the ideal situation as well as the perturbed systems in the presence of the disturbance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207