MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045474234 · doi:10.1190/urtec2013-231

Novel Approach to Determining Unconsolidated Reservoir Properties: Fabric and Flow in Oil Sands

2013· article· en· W2045474234 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Julie Dee Bell, Kanad Kulkarni, Marsha P. Maraj

Bibliographic record

VenueUnconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, Colorado, 12-14 August 2013 · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLondon South Bank UniversityUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringGeologyOil sandsFlow (mathematics)Geotechnical engineeringPetrologyMaterials scienceMechanicsComposite materialAsphalt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

URTeC 1581573 Unconsolidated reservoirs are reservoirs that differ from the traditional rock reservoir model and are inherently complex. It is well known that hydrocarbon recovery is strongly influenced, not only by the fabric and arrangement which exist in the producing reservoirs but is also governed by the fluid interfacial properties. A large study on fabric and reservoir characteristics including properties which influence flow was carried out on oil sands from the estuarine environment of the McMurray Formation from the Athabasca region in Canada. The approach of this study was to view oil sands material as unconsolidated material and in keeping with the initial fabric analysis findings, reservoir material was studied according to fabric components such as coarse material (quartz grains), fine material (silts and clays), bitumen and voids. Methods used for the overall study included: field analysis, thin section analysis, point counting analysis, image analysis, sedimentation studies, SEM, microCT analysis, NMR and core analysis. From the initial 2D fabric analysis, the coarse components of the host material were determined to be fine to medium sized quartz grains embedded in the micromass and in some locations clay bridges were observed between grains. Clays can obstruct the water envelope around the grains and these features differ from the established water wet model. Grain size variations and differences in porosity occur in the host and bioturbated material. Fabric analyses provide key details regarding reservoir characteristics and provide insight into the quality of payzones. Analysis of fabric components from cores samples representing three different estuarine depositional environments and initial findings are presented and discussed. Morphological characteristics of coarse components (quartz grains) along with mechanical features, such as etching on the grain surfaces, observed in SEM suggested the samples were from a transitional environment such as estuarine, agreeing with details logged from the core. The core samples were subjected to microCT scanning at a resolution of 9 microns and 3D pore network models were created from which pore morphology along with key engineering properties related to modeling flow were obtained. Reservoirs fabric characteristics along with reservoir engineering properties are easily obtained from this new approach and methods, which enhance the understanding of reservoir quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUnconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, Colorado, 12-14 August 2013Same topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207