MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045489447 · doi:10.1021/la305000w

Hyaluronic Acid Click Hydrogels Emulate the Extracellular Matrix

2013· article· en· W2045489447 on OpenAlexaff
Shawn C. Owen, Stephanie A. Fisher, Roger Y. Tam, Chelsea M. Nimmo, Molly S. Shoichet

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSelf-healing hydrogelsHyaluronic acidClick chemistryTissue engineeringEthylene glycolChemical engineeringMaterials sciencePorosityCell encapsulationExtracellular matrixDrug deliveryNanotechnologyPolymer chemistryChemistryBiomedical engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrogels are used to create 3D microenvironments with properties that direct cell function. The current study demonstrates the versatility of hyaluronic acid (HA)-based hydrogels with independent control over hydrogel properties such as mechanics, architecture, and the spatial distribution of biological factors. Hydrogels were prepared by reacting furan-modified HA with bis-maleimide-poly(ethylene glycol) in a Diels-Alder click reaction. Biomolecules were photopatterned into the hydrogel by two-photon laser processing, resulting in spatially defined growth factor gradients. The Young's modulus was controlled by either changing the hydrogel concentration or the furan substitution on the HA backbone, thereby decoupling the hydrogel concentration from mechanical properties. Porosity was controlled by cryogelation, and the pore size distribution, by the thaw temperature. The addition of galactose further influenced the porosity, pore size, and Young's modulus of the cryogels. These HA-based hydrogels offer a tunable platform with a diversity of properties for directing cell function, with applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations127
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLangmuirSame topicHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applicationsFrench-language works237,207