Long-Term Outcomes of Acute Irritant-induced Asthma
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RATIONALE: The long-term outcomes of acute irritant-induced asthma (IIA) are mostly unknown. OBJECTIVES: To study the long-term outcomes of IIA. METHODS: We reassessed 35 subjects who experienced IIA at a mean interval of 13.6 +/- 5.2 years. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The causal agent was chlorine in 20 cases (57%). At diagnosis, the mean +/- SD FEV(1) was 74.5 +/- 19.5% predicted, and all subjects showed bronchial hyperresponsiveness. At reassessment, all subjects reported respiratory symptoms, and 24 (68%) were on inhaled steroids. There were no significant improvements in FEV(1) and FEV(1)/FVC values. Twenty-three subjects had a methacholine test, and only six subjects had normal levels of responsiveness. Of the remaining 12 subjects, six had improvement in FEV(1) after bronchodilator >or=10%. In samples of induced sputum obtained from 27 subjects, six had eosinophils >or=2%. Levels of inflammatory and remodeling mediators were higher than in control subjects but were no different from subjects with occupational asthma due to sensitization. Quality of life score was 4.4 +/- 1.5 on a 0 (worst) to 7 (best) scale. Twelve subjects had an abnormal depression score. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first evidence of significant long-term impact of acute IIA on various outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it