L’approche variationniste à la pratique terminologique d’entreprise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente un projet de recherche sur la terminologie des composants structurels de la motocyclette Aprilia, axé sur une enquête de « sociolinguistique en milieu de travail » et qui a pour but de décrire le rapport réel entre terminologie et variétés de la langue, tout en considérant les études de Rita Temmerman sur la « théorie de la terminologie sociocognitive ». La présence et l’utilisation de la variété vénète en milieu de travail a été vérifié à l’aide d’un questionnaire de sociolinguistique, distribué à 10% des actifs chez Aprilia S.p.A. L’examen des données, a finalement mené à une analyse contrastive entre la « stratification linguistique en milieu de travail » et l’architecture de la langue italienne standard proposée par Berruto.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.023 | 0.053 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.020 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".