Irregularity of Airway Branching in a Mouse Bronchial Tree: A 3-D Morphometric Study.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Limited information on the degree of irregularity of branching patterns of a bronchial tree may obscure the cause of heterogeneous distribution of the lesions in a variety of lung diseases. We reconstructed three dimensional (3-D) images from hilum to terminal bronchioles of a mouse lung, and defined the irregularity of airway branching by diameter-based morphometric analysis. The relative diameter ratios of a daughter to the parent branch (D1/D0) and those of a minor to major daughter branches (D1/D2) were calculated, and irregular dichotomies were found to be distributed in 48% of bifurcations. D1/D0 is well correlated with D1/D2, and is proved to indicate regular and irregular branching, as well as D1/D2. Irregular branches with D1/D0 smaller than 0.4 correspond to typical lateral branches, taking off from major bronchi. Our novel 3-D morphometric analysis showed the first portrayal of the 3-D structures of mouse bronchial airways, which provides a quantitative description of branching patterns leading to the correlation with distribution of lesions in the diseased lung.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".