Urine Electrolytes in the Assessment of Extracellular Fluid Volume Contraction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine which urine electrolytes should be measured to confirm that the extracellular fluid (ECF) volume is depleted. ECF volume contraction was induced by furosemide administration to rats consuming an electrolyte-free diet. An external potassium balance was achieved by replacing potassium losses with KHCO3 and KCl so that the sodium and chloride deficits were comparable (equivalent to a 30% reduction in ECF volume). As expected, the urine sodium and chloride concentrations fell to 2 +/- 0.3 mmol/l and 3 +/- 0.3 mmol/l, respectively. Rats were then randomized to receive 50-75% of their sodium or chloride deficit as either: NaCl (control group), NH4Cl or NaHCO3 to mimic clinical situations associated with ECF volume contraction. In the NaCl group, the urine sodium and chloride concentrations remained low (6 +/- 2 mmol/l and 7 +/- 2 mmol/l), consistent with persistent ECF volume contraction. Although the NH4Cl group continued to have a low urine sodium concentration (2 +/- 0.2 mmol/l), there was now a marked increase in the urine chloride concentration (51 +/- 7 mmol/l; p less than 0.01 vs. NaCl group). In contrast, although the NaHCO3 group continued to have a low urine chloride concentration (2 +/- 1 mmol/l), there was a significant increase in the urine sodium concentration (19 +/- 3 mmol/l; p less than 0.01 vs. NaCl group). We conclude that the clinical assessment of ECF volume by urine electrolytes requires an evaluation of both the urine sodium and chloride concentrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".