Stereo Reconstruction of Droplet Flight Trajectories
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We developed a new method for extracting 3D flight trajectories of droplets using high-speed stereo capture. We noticed that traditional multi-camera tracking techniques fare poorly on our problem, in part due to the fact that all droplets have very similar shapes, sizes and appearances. Our method uses local motion models to track individual droplets in each frame. 2D tracks are used to learn a global, non-linear motion model, which in turn can be used to estimate the 3D locations of individual droplets even when these are not visible in any camera. We have evaluated the proposed method on both synthetic and real data and our method is able to reconstruct 3D flight trajectories of hundreds of droplets. The proposed technique solves for both the 3D trajectory of a droplet and its motion model concomitantly, and we have found it to be superior to 3D reconstruction via triangulation. Furthermore, the learned global motion model allows us to relax the simultaneity assumptions of stereo camera systems. Our results suggest that, even when full stereo information is available, our unsynchronized reconstruction using the global motion model can significantly improve the 3D estimation accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".