MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045698774 · doi:10.1115/1.4005061

Special Issue on Computational Fluid Mechanics and Fluid–Structure Interaction Preface

2011· article· en· W2045698774 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yuri Bazilevs, Kenji Takizawa, Tayfun E. Tezduyar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Mechanics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluid–structure interactionFinite element methodComputational fluid dynamicsAerodynamicsMultiphysicsFluid mechanicsDiscretizationContext (archaeology)Computer scienceMechanical engineeringComputational mechanicsAerospace engineeringMechanicsEngineeringPhysicsMathematicsGeologyStructural engineeringMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This special issue is a collection of the papers contributed by authors who were invited to speak at the symposium on Computational Methods for Fluid–Structure Interaction, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Vancouver, Canada, November 12–18, 2010. The symposium was organized by Yuri Bazilevs (University of California, San Diego), Kenji Takizawa (Waseda University, Tokyo), and Tayfun Tezduyar (Rice University).The special issue contains papers on advances in computational methods for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and fluid–structure interaction (FSI). FSI is one of the most important classes of multiphysics problems in modern mechanics. It is currently receiving much attention from the academic community, national laboratories, and the industrial sector.The papers mostly focus on moving-grid methods, such as the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian and space–time formulations. The methods discussed address the challenges of coupling rigid objects and free-surface flow, coupling of acoustic fluids and structures using a monolithic FSI approach, and coupling of discrete element and finite element methods in the context of particulate flows.The special issue contains papers on advances in patient-specific cardiovascular hemodynamics, FSI modeling of parachutes, air turbine aerodynamics, aerodynamics of flapping wings, ship hydrodynamics, liquid sloshing in tanks, and turbulence in the upper ocean. Low-order finite element method is the dominant spatial discretization technique in most of the special issue articles. However, spatial and temporal higher-order NURBS-based discretizations, such as those employed in isogeometric analysis, are also discussed and are found to increase the accuracy and robustness of the computations. One of the articles provides the methodology and background mathematical theory for how to correctly define boundary fluxes in coupled multiphysics simulations.We would like to thank the authors for their efforts in preparing the special issue articles, and for meeting the special issue deadlines. These contributions will undoubtedly help advance the fields of CFD and FSI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied MechanicsSame topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207