Transient entanglements and clusters in dilute polymer solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A convenient method to monitor polymer dissolution is to measure the pressure drop created by passing a polymer solution through a capillary constriction rheometer. In this work, we studied the dissolution of polyethylene oxide (PEO) and cationic starch (C‐starch). We found that for freshly dissolved and entangled PEO, the main contribution to the overall pressure drop is due to the contraction and expansion of PEO entanglements at the entrance and exit of the capillary, and that the friction in the capillary plays a minor role. On the other hand, for well‐dissolved PEO, because of the absence of PEO entanglements, the loss of pressure is mainly due to friction. At high velocities the contraction and expansion coefficient for freshly dissolved PEO was more than 20 times higher than for well‐dissolved PEO, resulting in a three times higher overall pressure drop. C‐starch consists of amylopectin (∼ 85%) and amylose and is known to contain clusters when freshly dissolved, likely formed from the globular amylopectin molecules. For C‐starch, the main contribution to the overall pressure drop is due to friction. Entrance and exit effects contribute only 10% to the overall pressure drop, which might be due to the linear amylose molecules in C‐starch. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 46: 253–262, 2008
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".