“New Choices” for substance‐using mothers and their children: Preliminary evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Setting, participants, intervention and measurement: New Choices is a centralized “one‐stop shop” in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, that provides multiple services in a supportive environment for substance‐using women and their young children. Measures of substance use, social support, mental health, nutrition, parenting and child development were administered to 13 women (21–36 years old) and their 13 children (0–5 years old) when they entered the programme, and at 3 and 6 months thereafter.Findings: Results revealed a significant improvement in maternal empathy at 3 months and children's social competence at 6 months, and a decrease in maternal support of children's power and independence that was significant at 3 months but not at 6 months. Improvements in other outcomes were not statistically significant, but effect sizes were promising. Results showed more improvements after 6 than 3 months, suggesting that length of programme involvement may be an important factor in outcome.Conclusions: The findings from this small pilot study suggest that a “one‐stop” intervention for substance‐using mothers and their children might have a positive impact on many outcomes. This evaluation involved a small cohort sample, no comparison group and parent‐report measures only, so it should be viewed as exploratory and interpretation of findings made cautiously.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".