Relapse after Emergency Department Discharge for Acute Asthma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to determine patient and treatment-response factors associated with relapse after emergency department (ED) treatment for acute asthma. METHODS: Subjects aged 18-55 years who were treated for acute asthma in 20 Canadian EDs prospectively underwent a structured ED interview and telephone contact 2 weeks later. RESULTS: Of 695 enrolled patients, 604 (86.9%) were discharged from the ED; follow-up was available in 529 (87.5%); 63% were female and the median age was 29 years. Most patients were discharged on oral (70.8%) and inhaled (60.1%) corticosteroids (CS); 2-week treatment adherences were 93.3 and 80.9%, respectively. Relapse occurred in 9.2% at 1 week (95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.1% to 12.0%) and 13.9% (95% CI = 11% to 17%) at 2 weeks. In multivariable modeling, factors associated with relapse were ethnicity (risk ratio [RR] white = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.83); female gender (RR = 1.57; 95% CI = 1.14 to 2.09); any ED visits in the past 2 years (RR = 1.47; 95% CI = 1.18 to 1.80); ever admitted for asthma treatment (RR = 1.83; 95% CI = 1.09 to 2.84); use of combined inhaled CS plus long-acting beta(2)-agonists (RR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.78) and of oral CS (RR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.12 to 1.59) at the time of ED presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnicity (white), female gender, prior ED visits and admissions for asthma, and recent treatments (especially oral CS) were associated with asthma relapse, which remains relatively common. Future research is required to target this high-risk group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".