MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045769591 · doi:10.1080/07060661.2011.610826

Effect of iron and nitrogen on the development of<i>Helminthosporium solani</i>and potato silver scurf

2011· article· en· W2045769591 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Benjamin Mimee, Tyler J. Avis, Sophia Boivin, Suha Jabaji, Russell J. Tweddell

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCarleton UniversityUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRhizoctonia solaniNitrogenBiologyAgronomyChemistryHorticultureOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Silver scurf is a surface blemish disease of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers caused by Helminthosporium solani Durieu & Mont. Silver scurf is becoming a disease of high economic impact. In this study, the effect of different iron (FeSO4, FeCl2) and nitrogen (NaNO2, NaNO3, NH4Cl, NH4NO3) salts on H. solani conidial germination and on potato silver scurf development was evaluated. The results show that iron and nitrogen salts affect in vitro germination of H. solani conidia. Conidia were particularly sensitive to FeSO4 and FeCl2. These salts completely inhibited conidial germination and were shown to be toxic at a concentration of 0.9 mM. Among the nitrogen salts tested, conidia were most affected by NaNO2 and NH4Cl, which almost completely inhibited their germination at a concentration of 169.7 mM. NaNO2 was also toxic to conidia. Among the salts tested, only FeSO4, FeCl2 and NaNO2 reduced the development of silver scurf. Comparison of the effect of the different tested salts leads to the conclusion that ions Fe++ and NO2 − have toxic effects on the conidia and repressive effects on silver scurf development while NO3 − and NH4 + have no toxic effect on conidia and no repressive effect on silver scurf development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicPlant Micronutrient Interactions and EffectsFrench-language works237,207