Wake Interference Effects for Two Surface-Mounted Finite Cylinders in a Tandem Configuration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mean wake of two identical surface-mounted finite-height circular cylinders arranged in a tandem configuration was investigated in a low-speed wind tunnel using a seven-hole pressure probe. The Reynolds number was Re = 2.4×104, the cylinder aspect ratio was AR = 9, and the boundary layer thickness on the ground plane relative to the cylinder height was δ/H ≈ 0.4. Three centre-to-centre longitudinal pitch ratios of L/D = 1.125, 2, and 5 were examined, corresponding to the extended-body, reattachment, and co-shedding flow regimes, respectively. Reference measurements were also made in the wake of a single finite circular cylinder of AR = 9. For the tandem configurations, velocity measurements were made behind the downstream cylinder in two orthogonal vertical planes. Compared to the wake of the single surface-mounted finite-height circular cylinder, the mean downwash and upwash flows for the tandem cylinders, behind the downstream cylinder, were weaker, the mean recirculation zone behind the downstream cylinder was shorter, and the mean wake extended higher above the ground plane, for all three pitch ratios. Marked changes were also observed in the mean streamwise wake vortex structures, compared to the case of the single finite cylinder. For the extended-body and reattachment flow regimes, the tip vortex structures became elongated in the wall-normal direction. In the co-shedding regime, two sets of tip vortices were observed, with the second set possibly originating from the upstream cylinder.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".